Berthfile

Biofouling & port-state-control compliance intelligence for vessels calling the Port of Brisbane. Blog · PSC risk check · Biofouling quick-fill

Blog · Biofouling Compliance

IMO 2023 & ABFMR v4: Biofouling Plans for Australian Ports

The 2026 Landscape for Australian Arrivals

Australia's strict biofouling requirements, administered by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF) under the Biosecurity Act 2015, have been mandatory for international arrivals since 15 June 2022. For vessel operators, masters, and shipping agents preparing for a port call in 2026, the baseline for compliance has evolved. The Australian Biofouling Management Requirements for Commercial Vessels (ABFMR-CV) Version 4 took effect on 30 April 2026. Please note this post provides general information for maritime professionals and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice.

Reporting Through MARS: The Three Accepted Practices

Before a vessel arrives in Australian territorial seas, operators must submit biofouling information through DAFF's Maritime Arrivals Reporting System (MARS) pre-arrival report. According to DAFF's biofouling requirements for commercial vessels, operators must demonstrate they are using one of exactly three accepted proactive biofouling management practices:

It is critical for operators to understand that a compliant antifouling coating alone is not recognized as an accepted proactive management practice for entry. Furthermore, do not confuse DAFF's biosecurity mandate with the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA), which separately administers the anti-fouling systems (AFS) certification and port state control regimes.

Aligning with the IMO 2023 Guidelines (MEPC.378(80))

For most commercial fleets, relying on a Biofouling Management Plan (BFMP) and Record Book (BFRB) is the most practical of the three options. However, to pass DAFF scrutiny, these documents must be rigorous. The global standard is the IMO 2023 Biofouling Guidelines, adopted via resolution MEPC.378(80) on 7 July 2023, which supersede the older 2011 guidelines.

While the IMO guidelines remain voluntary at the international level, Australia's binding minimum is dictated by the ABFMR. According to the IMO's GloFouling Partnerships documentation, the revised 2023 guidelines place a heavier emphasis on proactive inspections and niche area management.

A compliant BFMP must be highly specific to the vessel. Under the ABFMR Version 4 standards, the plan must list exact vessel particulars including the IMO number, date of construction, vessel type, gross tonnage, beam, length overall, and draughts. It must also explicitly state the dates of the most recent and next scheduled dry-docking. Crucially, the BFMP needs to outline detailed inspection schedules, designate management actions for specific niche areas, and list the biofouling risk parameters to be monitored while the vessel is in operation.

In-Water Cleaning and Record Keeping

Implementing the BFMP requires diligent logging in the Biofouling Record Book. Entries in the BFRB must be signed and dated by the vessel owner or the crew member in charge of the activity, proving that the proactive measures in the BFMP were actually carried out.

If a vessel undergoes in-water cleaning to manage biofouling, the resulting documentation must meet specific regulatory standards. Under ABFMR-CV Version 4, Appendix B sets out the mandatory minimum content for an in-water cleaning report. This evidence must be readily available if a DAFF biosecurity officer requests it during a vessel inspection.

Operators planning proactive cleaning within Australian waters face additional regulatory hurdles. For example, in-water hull cleaning in Queensland waters requires separate approval from Biosecurity Queensland (part of DETSI), above and beyond the federal DAFF capture requirements. The approval process is complex, often involving multiple government agencies and port authorities assessing both biosecurity risks and environmental impacts.

Actionable Takeaways for Your Next Port Call

To ensure a smooth clearance process and minimize the risk of targeted interventions upon arrival in Australia, masters and operators should take the following steps:

Using specialized decision-support tools can significantly streamline this preparation. Ship operators and agents can utilize Berthfile's biofouling copilot to cross-check their documentation against current DAFF standards, ensuring all MARS reporting requirements are met well before the vessel reaches Australian territorial seas.

Calling Brisbane soon?

Berthfile turns your vessel's particulars into a deterministic biofouling risk read with draft MARS paperwork, and scores your port-state-control exposure from AMSA's published inspection data. Free to try, nothing stored.

Check PSC risk Biofouling quick-fill